[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on the draft

To: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the draft
From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@gradin.cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 16:15:49 EDT
Cc: "Brian M. Thomas" <bt0008@entropy.sbc.com>, spki@c2.org, frantz@netcom.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Sep 1996 16:04:33 EDT." <3.0b11.32.19960903160249.005bb3d0@cybercash.com>
Posted-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 16:15:50 -0400 (EDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In message <3.0b11.32.19960903160249.005bb3d0@cybercash.com>, Carl Ellison writ
es:
>The way I parse this, you put the certificate into a tag-addressable memory,
>check that a particular set of tags is present and then go to work looking
>at tag contents.  Does that capture it?
>
Perfectly so.

>>I don't see why the placement of SIGNATURE makes any difference;
>>signatures should compute over all fields in a certificate except
>>other signature fields.
>
>I put the signature outside so that everything within the BEGIN/END block
>gets signed.
>
This is easily resolved, even if you include the SIGNATURE: tag in the
BEGIN/END block.
- -Angelos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMiyR8r0pBjh2h1kFAQHjSQQAjDjfMcfT40AJq9aZr0njPtL8gYvWqTLC
/pWOZ7xds/NveVxgD+eQujIhzM8OzNFJY+wDxX45UKxdoYdlUxrwuzg25Z3KCA7x
KzwIarFB+9YcunCXglOlEE0AfBPj2SjkfZOtr0TKMZWkWCrHNqH5fH4MW+kDIqYQ
G40VYb4KXRE=
=dfUW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:

Re: Thoughts on the draft

From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Thoughts on the draft
Next by Date: RPK Public Key Encryption System
Prev by thread: Re: Thoughts on the draft
Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on the draft
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread