[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject signing redux (was: Re: Mary is Mary)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 06:18 PM 6/26/97 +0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
>Also, when can we expect reference code for SPKI?
I'm told by others that their implementation, in the works, will be ready
within a couple of weeks of the new draft (assuming we don't have huge fights
over it, which I doubt).
"THE reference implementation" is a different issue. Is there expected to be a
single one? I thought the IETF way was to have multple implementations.
- Carl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM7LbX1QXJENzYr45AQGknQP/ZQsoAtcXMn2KZMYqyANoFhQo666zbg62
4PB0wpTYEEeQy20c5ktL97WDr1/6q8jnbl/bI2i7lnSMLUJHNr/DUiLjF5gVND/i
D0ItVATJmFWkQMagWDFzo1sZFdKWOVC2wmmQyucexq2AG2HAKN0P33rIOR+xks3l
190TjMnMV8U=
=cLns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc. http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|207 Grindall Street PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103 T:(410) 727-4288 F:(410)727-4293 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
References: