Re: IPSEC SMIB

[hughes@hughes.network.com (James P. Hughes)]

On Aug 11,  4:03pm, Ran Atkinson wrote:
> Subject: Re: IPSEC SMIB
>
> Jim,
>
>   You are worrying about a non-existent problem.  Everyone is telling you
> this.  Please listen to our words.  This is not a problem.  IANA
> registration has worked well for over a decade.  I am aware of
> ZERO problems during this time period.

I am obviously not experienced with the IETF proces for allocating this type of
number.

If someone had said "you may get proprietary numbers from IANA by asking"
without "in all likelyhood", "probability" and "close to zero" I would have
backed off.

>   Please lets concentrate on specifying the protocol.

Not a problem.

jim

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: IPSEC SMIB
• From: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)

References:

• Re: IPSEC SMIB
• From: "Michael St. Johns" <stjohns@ARPA.MIL>
• Re: IPSEC SMIB
• From: hughes@hughes.network.com (James P. Hughes)
• Re: IPSEC SMIB
• From: Ran Atkinson <atkinson@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: IPSEC SMIB
• Next by Date: Re: IPSEC SMIB
• Prev by thread: Re: IPSEC SMIB
• Next by thread: Re: IPSEC SMIB
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread