[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security

To: " " <amir@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 17:43:30 -0500
Cc: bound@zk3.dec.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 1995 17:04:33 EST." <199503102204.AA10887@interlock.ans.net>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com


Amir says:
> 
> Jim says:
> > I see no consensus that you keep saying with phrases like "I suspect
> > that others feel the same way".  I do see one hand clapping.
> 
> Agreed. Not even a `rough' one... :-)

Sigh.

Please go back and re-read. Jim was quoting me writing about building
the best system we can and letting the lawyers fight with
governments. It had nothing to do with SKIP. How Jim turned the
message into a SKIP message is beyond me. I wasn't discussing SKIP.

Perry

References:

Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security

From: " " <amir@watson.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security
Next by Date: Re: Only 1 IPSEC Session at Danvers?
Prev by thread: Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security
Next by thread: Re: (IPng) Proposed message on perfect forward security
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread