[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bellovin's and Ahar's attacks

To: warlord@MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
Subject: Re: Bellovin's and Ahar's attacks
From: uri@watson.ibm.com
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 1995 16:07:02 -0500 (EDT)
Cc: pau@watson.ibm.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199504122255.AA05479@interlock.ans.net> from "Derek Atkins" at Apr 12, 95 06:54:57 pm
Reply-To: uri@watson.ibm.com

Derek Atkins says:
> Perhaps instead of using network latency, you use some other measure
> to time out a packet.

I can't help but notice, that it seems like IP shouldn't really
be secure from the Steve's attack at all. Maybe being host-to-
host secure is good enough for Secure IP, and Socket Layer
Security could take care of mutually agressive users
[on the same host]?
--
Regards,
Uri         uri@watson.ibm.com      N2RIU
===========
<Disclamer>

References:

Re: Bellovin's and Ahar's attacks

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Bellovin's and Ahar's attacks
Next by Date: Re: Bellovin's and Ashar's attacks
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread