[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: editorial on Photuris

To: rja@cs.nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: editorial on Photuris
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 17:10:31 EST
Cc: Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:35:53 EST." <199511142037.AA03346@interlock.ans.net>

> There is no process problem with the IETF referencing PGP certificates.
> The IETF is not restricted to only referencing IETF specs.

FYI: There is currently an I-D specifying the format of PGP version 2
(and version 3) packet formats.  This specification includes the
definition of public key certificates.

Hopefully this draft will be lifted to an RFC in the near future.
Please feel free to comment on it.  It is currently called:
	draft-atkins-pgpformat-01.txt

-derek

References:

Re: editorial on Photuris

From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.cs.nrl.navy.mil>

Prev by Date: Re: Reporter claiming SKIP...
Next by Date: Re: editorial on Photuris
Prev by thread: Re: editorial on Photuris
Next by thread: Re: editorial on Photuris
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread