[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SPI orthogonality

To: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: SPI orthogonality
From: Ben Rogers <ben@Ascend.COM>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 14:57:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199707091846.OAA00256@coredump.cis.upenn.edu>
References: <199707091846.OAA00256@coredump.cis.upenn.edu>
Reply-To: ben@Ascend.COM (Ben Rogers)
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Angelos D. Keromytis writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> 
> I believe this has not been answered (not "officially" anyway): are
> the SPI-spaces for AH and ESP orthogonal or not ? Meaning: are the SAs
> identified by tuples (SPI/Remote Address) or by (SPI/Remote
> Address/Protocol), where Protocol = {AH, ESP} ?
> - -Angelos

The last time I asked this question, it was as a result of
inconsistencies between the IPsec and ISAKMP drafts.  The response was
that the IPsec draft was in error (and would be modified).  SA's are
indexed by SPI/Remote Address/Protocol triplets.

ben

Follow-Ups:

Re: SPI orthogonality

From: Dan.McDonald@eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)

Re: SPI orthogonality

From: Derrell Piper <piper@cisco.com>

References:

SPI orthogonality

From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>

Prev by Date: SPI orthogonality
Next by Date: Re: SPI orthogonality
Prev by thread: SPI orthogonality
Next by thread: Re: SPI orthogonality
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread