[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MSS option with IPSEC.

To: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
Subject: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@iijlab.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 07:52:12 +0900
cc: ipsec@tis.com
cc: itojun@itojun.org
In-reply-to: sommerfeld's message of Mon, 24 Aug 98 16:43:27 -0400. <199808242043.QAA04819@thunk.epilogue.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


>The mss value isn't as important as the path MTU; if your TCP
>implements MTU discovery (and it interacts correctly with your ipsec
>.. i.e., ipsec causes the percived MTU to shrink) the right thing
>should happen as long as the MSS is big enough..

	thanks, I fixed my implementation to not to play with MSS option
	itself.

itojun

References:

Re: MSS option with IPSEC.

From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>

Prev by Date: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Next by Date: IPsecond focus groups
Prev by thread: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Next by thread: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread