[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Secret public keys

To: Stephen.Waters@cabletron.com, dpj@IntegritySciences.com
Subject: RE: Secret public keys
From: David Chen <dchen@indusriver.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:34:12 -0400
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, ietf-ipsra@vpnc.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990723134652.00812070@world.std.com>
References: <29752A74B6C5D211A4920090273CA3DCA868AF@new-exc1.ctron.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

I thought we like the public key as "public" as possible. (so that to
prevent attack)
How can someone want a "secret" for "public" key ?
If it is secret, then it is private.
Don't you agree?
--- David

References:

RE: Secret public keys

From: "Waters, Stephen" <Stephen.Waters@cabletron.com>

RE: Secret public keys

From: David Jablon <dpj@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Secret public keys
Next by Date: Aggressive mode fallback to main mode
Prev by thread: RE: Secret public keys
Next by thread: RE: Secret public keys
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread