[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Racing QM Initiator's
>
> Please note that until such a statement makes it into the rfc, what you are
> doing may not be interoperable.
>
I fully understand that, and it had been my intention all along to find out how
others deal with it.
> Why is it such a problem to support both initiator and responder for both
> phase 1 and phase 2 SA's? A robust implementation should be able to do this.
Since it is not spelt out in the RFC on how to handle race condition, different
people could interpret it differently. I'd find it rather confusing to see two
phase1 SAs between the same addresses. But if that is the way it should be,
we'll conform.
Follow-Ups:
References: