[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Racing QM Initiator's
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Radha Gowda wrote:
> > 3. One SG aborts and becomes responder. How do you know which should
> > abort? The SG with the lowest IP address?
>
> Ben, we also experienced the same problem. Not just in phase2, but in phase1
>
> as well. Just to get things going, we decided to let the one with the higher
>
> IP address be the initiator.
>
Please note that until such a statement makes it into the rfc, what you are
doing may not be interoperable.
Why is it such a problem to support both initiator and responder for both
phase 1 and phase 2 SA's? A robust implementation should be able to do this.
jan
--
Jan Vilhuber vilhuber@cisco.com
Cisco Systems, San Jose (408) 527-0847
Follow-Ups:
References: