[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSEC and ISAKMP MIBs

To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Subject: Re: IPSEC and ISAKMP MIBs
From: "Luis A. Sanchez" <lsanchez@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:37:28 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Ruchir Malhotra <ruchir@broadpac.com>, "'Ricky Charlet'" <rcharlet@redcreek.com>, "Shriver, John" <john.shriver@intel.com>, "Ipsec (E-mail)" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <002201bffc46$e137bd20$8a1b6e0a@jariws1.arenanet.fi> from Jari Arkkoat "Aug 2, 2000 08:59:53 am"
Reply-to: lsanchez@bbn.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> 
> It would be interesting to compare the configuration MIB approach and the IPsec
> policy WG approach. If the latter reaches a consensus on a schema for IPsec policy,
> perhaps the same schema could be represented in multiple ways, as an LDAP database,
> as a textual language, as COPS PIB, as an SNMP MIB, ...?
> 

Jari,

	The IPsec policy configuration document is moving forward in
IPSP. There is already an IPsec PIB document and it derives from the
IPsec configuration data model. The configuration MIB will follow the
same steps. On a separate note, I suggest we move this discussion to
the IPsec Policy mailing list (ipsec-policy@vpnc.org)

Luis

References:

Re: IPSEC and ISAKMP MIBs

From: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: IPSEC and ISAKMP MIBs
Next by Date: Heartbeats Straw Poll
Prev by thread: Re: IPSEC and ISAKMP MIBs
Next by thread: IPSec Performance Tests
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread