[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simplifying IKE

To: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: Re: Simplifying IKE
From: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 03:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1010809222124.8177E-100000@spsystems.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108091910410.5268-100000@janpc-home.cisco.com><Pine.BSI.3.91.1010809222124.8177E-100000@spsystems.net>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Henry Spencer writes:
 > On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Jan Vilhuber wrote:
 > > Hm.. Not sure where to go with this discussion. What's the difference between
 > > people (and not just one or two) *thinking* they need something, and it being
 > > true that they need it? If there's enough of them, then it becomes true.
 > 
 > No; belief and reality *are* different.  The way you tell the difference
 > is to design and build a decent-but-not-all-things-to-all-people solution,
 > and listen to see if the outraged screams and angry grumbling slowly die 
 > away.

   Ah, the beloved OS vendor to the masses stance.

   Glad to know where you stand.

	   Mike

Follow-Ups:

Re: Simplifying IKE

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

References:

Re: Simplifying IKE

From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>

Re: Simplifying IKE

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying IKE
Next by Date: Re: DRAFT: ipsec charter update
Prev by thread: one vs. many (was Re: Simplifying IKE)
Next by thread: Re: Simplifying IKE
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread