Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.5 Plausible denaibility

[Jean-Jacques Puig <jean-jacques.puig@int-evry.fr>]

Hi,

> 2.5.A) Does SOI need to provide "plausible deniability" (the opposite
> of "non-repudiation") for the initiator?
> 
> 2.5.B) Does SOI need to provide "plausible deniability" (the opposite
> of "non-repudiation") for the responder?

	This nice feature does no worth the expense it involves.
Current SOI should not become a way of doing a kind of network diplomacy/politics.
May be for the next really-in-the-future generation IKEvN (N>=3) ?

--
Jean-Jacques Puig