RE: apology

[jsjoberg@toplayer.com]

The technical input of this thread is absolutely riveting.

Steve, thank you for starting this thread and helping make this whole
process work!

Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Kent [mailto:kent@bbn.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:38 PM
> To: Chinna N.R. Pellacuru
> Cc: IP Security List
> Subject: Re: apology
> 
> 
> At 2:28 PM -0700 6/27/02, Chinna N.R. Pellacuru wrote:
> >Steve, unless you are a conspiracy theorist or something, 
> this is pretty
> >much common knowledge. No one represents the corporation 
> cisco, like no
> >one represents bbn. So, people brought this to your 
> attention! Wonder why
> >you think "we" meant cisco and not just people who agree 
> with me. If some
> >one puts out a draft and the author is from cisco, does it mean the
> >proposal is from cisco?!
> >
> >     chinna
> >
> 
> Since it has become clear that most of your colleagues are 
> embarrassed by your postings on this list and that you do not 
> represent your employer's position in any way, I see no point in 
> wasting time responding to your rants.
> 
> Steve
>