[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: One base SOI ID? Humm

To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 02:27:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <p05111a15b95deb3a6795@[165.227.249.18]>
References: <3.0.3.32.20020718201652.012e3e70@mail><541402FFDC56DA499E7E13329ABFEA87060C06@SARATOGA><3.0.3.32.20020718201652.012e3e70@mail>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

At 09:16 AM 7/19/2002 -0700, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
>At 8:16 PM -0700 7/18/02, Alex Alten wrote:
>>It sounds like the requirements were never really spec'd out.
>>Why not specify the top 10 requirements, and then run a test/
>>runoff/review of the two proposals.  The one that meets the 10
>>requirements the best should be the winner.
>
>Errrr, that is what the past many weeks of questions from the WG 
>chairs was doing. If you were following it, you would have seen that 
>there was no unanimity among the WG about what are the requirements.
>

Hmm... If that's the case then probably the only way to decide
is to have the WG abide by the results of a coin toss.

Good luck.

- Alex
--

Alex Alten
Alten@ATTBI.com

References:
- Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>
- One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
- Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: combined mode algo
Next by Date: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
Prev by thread: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
Next by thread: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread