On 2/25/2003 1:53 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > The requirement to run dynamic routing protocols was NOT the question > asked. Please re-read Shelton's question before commenting on my > answer. Quoting my answer out of context and applying alternate > requirements is both rude and unhelpful. > > In particular, he asked: > >>imagine that I have a GRE tunnel to a remote clinic; further suppose I >>need the traffic to be IPSec b/c of HIPPA regs. Should I have more >>accurately asked for IPSec in GRE, as opposed to GRE w/in IPSec? > > I see nothing in here about dynamic routing protocols. Do you? Sorry. I missed that it was Raymond and not Sandeep (the sender of the original email) who sent the email you replied to. I agree that Raymond's requirements are probably different from Sandeep's. > PS: I see no earlier reply in this thread. What is the subject and > messageID of your earlier reply? Message-ID: <3E5B1BA1.6050406@isi.edu> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:30:41 -0800 From: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU> To: ssakhuja@cisco.com CC: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, xbone <xbone@ISI.EDU> Subject: Re: IPSec over GRE why ? Lars -- Lars Eggert <larse@isi.edu> USC Information Sciences Institute
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature