Re: Moving forward on RFC 2401-bis

[Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>]

Angelos,

>Karen, great. One nit: none of the items are "resolved" as such. They need to
>be discussed on the list first. (That's because, unlike the issues in the IKE
>draft, these are architectural changes that have not been previously
>discussed.)

	Sorry for not being clear.  What I was trying to say is
	that we "believe" they've been resolved (because they've
	been discussed on the list and a consensus appeared to have
	been reached) and that we'll circulate descriptions of each
	issue.  I was assuming that when these were distributed to
	the list, folks would get a chance to look at the writeups
	and assess them, presumably with the opportunity to change
	things etc.

Karen

>Cheers,
>-Angelos
>
>In message <p05200f0dbb6c4b053bc0@[128.89.89.115]>, Karen Seo writes:
>>Folks,
>>
>>Just an update... We've reviewed the 9 items on the IPsec tracking
>>list for 2401:
>>
>>1. We believe the following 5 items have been resolved.  At the
>>beginning of next week, we will send out individual writeups for the
>>following items:
>>	47	All selectors can be a list of ranges, per IKEv2 spec
>>	48	Add ToS traffic selector option
>>	49	Red-side fragmentation option
>>	50	Tunnel vs transport mode
>>	57	ECN support
>>
>>2. Four of the items are inter-related and should be addressed
>>together as part of the new IPsec processing model, which is still
>>being discussed.  Later next week, we will send out a revised version
>>of the write up on the processing model with updates reflecting
>>feedback/conclusions to date.  This will cover the following items:
>>	40	Interface SPD selector vs per-interface SPD
>>	44	Forwarding table lookup to select virtual interface ID
>>	45	Use of cache with de-correlated SPD
>>	46	No need for iterated processing
>>
>>3. In addition to the items in the tracking system, there are a
>>number of other issues that have come up during the past months.
>>Over the next couple of weeks, we will be sending out descriptions of
>>these issues for group review/discussion.
>>
>>Have a good weekend!
>>Karen
>>