[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Identity certification

To: Jueneman@gte.com
Subject: Re: Identity certification
From: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 04:03:35 +0200
Cc: spki@c2.org
In-Reply-To: <3133343F-00000001@wotan.gte.com>
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
References: <3133343F-00000001@wotan.gte.com>
Sender: owner-spki@c2.org

> I don't want to accuse you or anyone else of not having done their homework, 
> but I get the very strong impression that some people haven't read X.509 V3 in 
> detail. (Since it hasn't been officially published in hard copy form yet, 
> that's not totally surprising, but I thought that most of the people on this 
> list would have had access to the V3 spec and the proposed Draft Amendment 
> which lays out additional extensions.)

Could someone please point out where I can obtain the X.509 V3
specification and a description for all the interpretation issues?  I
believe there are a number of other people who would also be interested.

    Tatu

References:

Re: Identity certification

From: Jueneman@gte.com

Prev by Date: encodings, character sets, general requirements
Next by Date: Re: going back to stone axes
Prev by thread: Re: Identity certification
Next by thread: Re: Identity certification
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread