[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: encoding: SPKI vs. SDSI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Carl" == Carl Ellison <email@example.com> writes:
Carl> S has the advantage of being readable and editable in your
Carl> favorite text editor (the PostScript lesson) while L can be
Carl> processed more easily by normal code.
I would propose a L' that is L with all binary integers (lengths,
types, etc..) expressed in \n%08x format. If 32 bits aren't enough for
the length of other byte sequences, then we probably have a problem.
Carl> OTOH, S is editable by a standard text editor. We could
Carl> consider adding counts to S, to provide the same LR(0)
Carl> benefit, but maintaining those counts in a text editor would
Carl> be a nightmare.
I like editable. I also like S-expressions, but I'm not overly attached
to them. I've written S-expression parsers that do not recurse implicitely
(using the system stack), but rather push their state into the dotted
pair that is being formed.
] Temporarily located in balmy Helsinki, Finland, at SSH | one quark [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON | two quark [
] firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ | red q blue q[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----