[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Revocation...
Yes, the idea is that during the first phase (between the not-before and
the good-until), no checks are needed, and that if you do a check during
the second phase (between the good-until and the not-after) you get back
a new certificate with new not-before/good-until/not-after dates...
Cheers,
Ron
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
>...
Is the idea that once the "good-until" date has been passed, and you do
the check, that you get a new "good-until" date?
Cheers,
Ben.
- --
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
------- End of forwarded message -------
Follow-Ups: