[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: anti-replay notification

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: anti-replay notification
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:07:51 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <v03102808b0212086ec17@[128.89.0.110]>
References: <199708202049.NAA26034@pita.cisco.com><97Aug20.152540edt.11652@janus.tor.securecomputing.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

I would rather explain how pigs can fly than explain why we are again
delaying IPsec.

At 06:42 PM 8/20/97 -0400, you wrote:
> But can we explain this to the
> greater IETF community with a straight face?

References:

Re: anti-replay notification

From: Derrell Piper <piper@cisco.com>

Re: anti-replay notification

From: Norman Shulman <norm@tor.securecomputing.com>

Re: anti-replay notification

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
Next by Date: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
Prev by thread: Re: anti-replay notification
Next by thread: Re: rush to get spec out
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread