[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSec Throughput

To: Ted Hannock <thannock@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IPSec Throughput
From: Theo PAGTZIS <T.Pagtzis@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 15:29:54 +0200
cc: "'ipsec@lists.tislabs.com'" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Apr 1999 10:08:21 EDT." <01BE9095.E1F1CE40@mtlaurel-dhcp-232.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Is that only authentication or encryption as well that is required?

Theo
(UCL)

>To All,
>
>Does anyone know what effect IPSec has on a particular transmission?  I read t
>he RFC and it stated that the AH is 31 bytes long.  Is this the only overhead 
>to an encrypted packet?  If not, what else is added and how much overhead?  If
> a 1meg file is encrypted using IPSec, what does the header/encryption add to 
>this file?
>
>Any feedback would be appreciated.
>
> C I S C O  S Y S T E M S     Ted Hannock
>                                         Systems Engineer
>                                      Cable East Operations 
>
>       ||         ||        Voice - 1.609.642.7073
>       ||         ||        Pager (Voice) - 1.800.365.4578 
>      ||||       ||||       Pager (E-Mail) - thannock@epage.cisco.com
>     ||||||     ||||||      Fax - 1.609.642.7098 
>    ||||||||| |||||||||     E-mail - thannock@cisco.com 
>
>308 Harper Drive, Suite 100 
>Moorestown, New Jersey 08057
>
>

References:

IPSec Throughput

From: Ted Hannock <thannock@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ipv4 IPSec extensions
Next by Date: IPSec Throughput
Next by thread: Re: Algorithm OIDs in RFC 2104
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread