[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simultaneous lifetime type support required?
> Roy Pereira wrote:
>
> Yes. Both expiry types should be supported at the same time. Expiry
> would happen when either of the expiry values et triggered.
>
> Scott wrote:
> I recognize the need to support both types, but the question
> is, am I required to support both types simultaneously? That
> is, if you send me 2 lifetime payloads together, one in
> kbytes and one in seconds, does this mean you want both
> values used, with the actual expiration based upon whichever
> occurs first?
The question has not been answered satisfactorily by any of the
responses to date. Let me rephrase: where in the document set does it
state that a system MUST/should/may support simultaneous specification
of seconds/kbytes for SA lifetimes, terminating the SA depending upon
which limit is reached first? I see a reference to multiple lifetimes in
DOI (section 4.5.2), but this is just parsing info, and does not contain
any language indicating the implementation status (must/may/should). I
see no other references.
Follow-Ups:
References: